Six Feet Under, Thumbs-Up Diner, Ru San’s and others that failed health inspections last month

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Gmail

Fulton County restaurants that failed their health inspection in June

What’s considered failing?

Sign up now to get our Daily Breaking News Alerts

Opt out at anytime

Failing scores change from one health inspector to the next but the industry standard is that anything below a 70 (out of 100) is failing, according to April Majors, public information officer for the Fulton County Environmental Health Services Department.

With out further ado, here’s a list of Fulton County restaurants that failed their health inspection in June– Bon appétit!

Six Feet Under

Failed inspection: June 24, 2011 Score: 58, Grade: U (Full report and violations)

(685 11th Street Atlanta, GA 30318)


Thumbs Up Diner

Failed inspection: June 24, 2011 Score: 57, Grade U (Full report and violations)

(826 Marietta St Atlanta, GA 30318)

 

Ru San’s

Failed inspection: June 21, 2011 Score: 60, Grade: U (Full report and violations)

(1529 Piedmont Road Atlanta, GA 30324)

 

Harlem Nights

Failed inspection: June 22, 2011 Score: 64, Grade: U (Full report and violations)

(201 Courtland Street Atlanta, GA 30303)

 

Cinco De Mayo

Failed inspection: June 21, 2011 Score: 68, Grade: U (Full report and violations)

(1332 Boulevard SE Atlanta, Ga 30315)

 

Concourse Athletic Club

Failed inspection: June 21, 2011 Score: 69, Grade: U (Full report and violations)

(8 Concourse Parkway NE Atlanta, GA 30328)

 

Presepolis Cuisine

Failed inspection: June 20, 2011 Score: 58, Grade: U (Full report and violations)

(6435 Roswell Road Atlanta, GA 30328)

 

Patrick’s Sub Shop

Failed inspection: June 20, 2011 Score: 68, Grade: U (Full report and violations)

(1200 COLLIER RD NW ATLANTA, GA 30318)

 

Green Sprout

Failed inspection: June 21, 2011 Score: 62, Grade: U (Full report and violations)

(1529 Piedmont Avenue Suite D Atlanta, GA 30324)

China Five

Failed inspection: June 6, 2011 Score: 66, Grade U (Full report and violations)

(20 Broad Street Suite F Atlanta, GA 30303)

 

Chef Anthony’s

Failed inspection: June 24, 2011 Score: 33, Grade: U (Full report and violations)

(371 Boulevard SE Atlanta, GA 30312)

 

Southside Wings

Failed inspection: June 20, 2011 Score: 62, Grade: U (Full report and violations)

(5330 Old National Highway Suite A College Park, GA 30349)

 

New Dragon

Failed inspection: June 17, 2011 Score: 58, Grade: U (Full report and violations)

(1170 Collier Road Suite D Atlanta, GA 30318)

 

Pavillion Cafe

Failed inspection: June 15, 2011 Score: 61, Grade: U (Full report and violations)

(1150 Lake Hearn Drive Suite #360 Atlanta, GA 30342)

 

Big Easy Grille

Failed inspection: June 20, 2011 Score: 48, Grade: U (Full report and violations)

(1193 Collier Road Atlanta, GA 30318)

 

 

[Editor’s note: The health inspection reports listed might not reflect the most recent scores for these restaurants. Follow-up scores will only be posted for restaurants that pass their next routine (random) inspection. Wondering why we don’t publish re-inspections and passing scores? Click here.]

For more mouthwatering news:

Follow us on Twitter and Find us on Facebook!

Caleb J. Spivak

Caleb J. Spivak

Caleb J. Spivak

Caleb J. Spivak

12 Responses

  1. You do realize that having the ice scoop in the ice machine (and not in a separate container) is a violation. Cloths that are used to wipe off tables are supposed to be in a solution which necessitates wringing them out every time before use – things that slow restaurants down.
    Some of the laws don’t make sense in the context of a busy restaurant. Having a clean restaurant and proper food storage and handling is important but some of the other stuff is just bureaucracy.

  2. Some of it is bureaucracy, however, many restaurants still get 100’s or A’s. No excuse for a failing grade. Ever.

  3. Not really surprised about Ru’sans. Too bad because it’s a fun atmosphere and has some low price options but I’m scared to eat there now.

  4. When will you guys start reporting on restaurants with perfect/extremely high health scores? You guys are losing focus from your original concept, if I wanted to hear about low health scores I could just watch CBS.

  5. ^Stop complaining. These posts are interesting to read. Skip over them if you dont like the content.

  6. Ru San’s on Piedmont is the only sushi restaurant I’ve ever gotten food poisoning from. I have a lot of friends who like the place, but BOTH times I’ve eaten there resulted in pain and agony a few hours later. I haven’t been back in over four years, but it looks like nothing has changed. I am not surprised.

  7. RuSan’s is like Waffle House – no one has any illusions about its cleanliness, and no one is perturbed enough not to eat there. RuSan’s is delicious and cheap, and I’ll be back.

  8. did you guys even bother reading why a restaurant fails health inspection? Rusan’s failed because a chef prepared food with his bare hands. Ever handled sushi rice with gloves when you need to keep your hands (in gloves) wet? This inspection was also held during their lunch buffet time and all of them seem to be associated with it. I just don’t think these new health rules and the sushi buffet concept go hand in hand.

  9. Some of these scores are not accurate. Six Feet Under for instance was marked off 6 points just for having a garbage can on the wring side of a hand washing station. That was just one of the many things they were marked off for that was at the discretion of the inspector. They also have never been below a 90 since they opened. I think some of the people in Fulton county are going overboard and not taking into consideration that it is a working operation. Yes, when you are doing $20-$30K a day, there might be a couple of things out of place during the lunch rush. I understand some of these places really are bad, however, I would look at the previous scores for right now (until the health department comes up with a concrete system) for an accurate representation of what’s going on. Right now the inspectors are using too much of their own opinions when marking off points.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Search